Something unknown appears to be suppressing the growth of the gargantuan structures that connect the universe in a cosmic web, a finding that challenges our current understanding of physics, according to a new study.
Scientists have presented new observational evidence that large-scale structures, which are enormous filaments and nodes made of gas and dark matter, are growing at a slower rate than predicted by the standard model of cosmology. The growth of these structures—meaning the rate at which they clump together—may have slowed down in the later eras of the universe, a scenario that could help to explain a major cosmic mystery known as the sigma-8 tension.
Videos by VICE
The cosmic web is a network of large-scale structures that stretch for hundreds of millions of light years and intersect at points called nodes. These structures are primarily made of dark matter, an unidentified substance that accounts for most of the mass of the universe. The cosmic web influences the distribution of matter in the universe; gas and galaxies travel along the filaments and accumulate into dense regions, such as galaxy clusters, at the nodes.
The standard model, also known as the Lambda cold dark matter model (ΛCDM), offers predictions about the long-scale evolution of these structures, which have mostly been validated by observations. However, some observations seem to defy the model, such as the value of sigma-8, which is a term used to describe the distribution of matter in the universe.
Now, scientists led by Minh Nguyen, an astrophysicist and cosmologist at the University of Michigan, suggest that the growth of large-scale structures has been suppressed in the modern universe, even as the overall expansion of the universe has accelerated over time due to a mysterious force known as dark energy. The researchers concluded that some “cosmological tensions can be interpreted as evidence of growth suppression” and that the sigma-8 tension could be effectively resolved by their hypothesis, according to a new study published in Physical Review Letters.
“We did not set out to look for evidence of a late-time suppression specifically,” said Nguyen in an email to Motherboard. “Our original intention was to see whether the history of the cosmic background expansion is consistent with the history of cosmic structure growth.”
“The universe has always been expanding, and lately the expansion has accelerated,” he continued. “This expansion has always acted as a ‘friction’ against the growth of cosmic structures (while gravity has the opposite effect to growth). Therefore—even within the standard model—we also expect growth to be suppressed if the expansion is winning, as our observational data has indicated. In fact, any cosmological model would simultaneously predict both growth and expansion histories.”
In other words, Nguyen’s team is not the first team to observe the suppression of cosmic growth in later eras of the universe, though the researchers took a new approach that constrained key parameters of this trend.
“Our question was a little more specific: Do current data prefer the same growth and expansion histories predicted by the standard model? And we found that the answer is no,” Nguyen said. “The growth history preferred by the data exhibits this late-time suppression (relative to the standard model’s prediction) even though data and theory would agree in the expansion history.”
Scientists have developed a few techniques to clock the growth of large-scale structures over the course of the universe’s 13.8-billion-year lifetime. The oldest light in the universe, known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB), reveals insights about the cosmic web in the deep past. Scientists also use a cosmic effect called gravitational lensing, in which light is warped and brightened by massive objects as it moves through space, to map out the distribution of matter in the more recent “dark-energy-dominated” universe, which began about four billion years ago.
Nguyen and his colleagues created a timeline of large-scale structure evolution that incorporates both of these techniques, as well as movements of local galaxies to help fill in more recent growth patterns. The new study is the first to show that these different datasets from various probes—each of which reveal distinct cosmic eras and spatial scales—appear to “separately and jointly prefer a late-time growth suppression,” Nguyen said.
“Seeing that different data sets are in tension in the standard model, yet are consistent within an alternative where growth has been suppressed recently, we were then motivated to investigate and able to show that many other current cosmological tensions can be related to this growth anomaly,” he explained. “I think we’re also the first to do this.”
If future studies were to corroborate the findings, scientists could potentially resolve the finicky sigma-8 tension. This cosmological problem arises from the fact that measurements using the CMB, gravitational lensing, and other techniques return different values of sigma-8. Nguyen and his colleagues suggest this is because the growth, or “clumpiness,” of large-scale structures is actually quite different over the course of the universe’s lifetime relative to the predictions of the standard model. To that end, the team’s new constraints on this late-stage growth suppression turned out to be statistically strong, reaching a high confidence level known as “4-sigma.”
“It’s definitely surprising and interesting given the ~4-sigma significance we achieved,” Nguyen said. “We’re more surprised by the statistical significance of the finding. In fact, we went back and forth for a long time to see if we had missed something. The actual analysis and writing took much less time than all the testing and checking, hunting for a computer bug or assumption error that’s never there.”
The researchers note that it will take more research and observation to build on their findings, and figure out exactly what it means for our understanding of reality.
“I think the first thing to do is answer whether this is a data-driven discovery or a systematic-driven ‘discovery,’ Nguyen said. “So we would like to examine data of the same cosmological probes but from different experiments” and “examine data of different cosmological probes that characterize growth of structure at different times and scales since at the end of the day, whatever the true scenario/model/theory is, it must make a consistent prediction(s) for growth (and expansion) at all times and on all scales.”
“We think the universe is trying to tell us something,” he concluded. “We’re not sure yet what it really means, but we will keep listening and report back!”
Update: This article has been updated to include comments from lead author Minh Nguyen.
